We live in a strange era where people seem entitled to their own facts.
In the last blog post, I talked about the pros and cons of online discourse. To recap, I was primarily arguing that internet arguments are better than traditional arguments. This comes from how written arguments have a greater capacity for thoughtful expression, and how online resources permit anyone to establish authority with citations and references.
But I ended with a bit of a cliffhanger: What happens when someone accustomed to online argumentation encounters someone accustomed to offline argumentation? What changes? What gets lost in translation?
More importantly, is it a big deal?
Today, I'll argue that the answer to that last question is yes. So much of a big deal, in fact, that it determined the 2012 election.